Archive for November 3rd, 2008

Obama’s Famous Quotes, and a Ten-Year-Old’s Wisdom

Monday, November 3rd, 2008

Hey, Y’all.

Last day to blog before the election. Didn’t finish my A-Z series. Not because there wasn’t enough info, but because there was too much. Instead, I opted to let Mr. Obama do the talking for me, by listing his quotes, his latest scandals, and an interview I did with my daughter this morning. Away we go…

I decided to do an interview about the upcoming election with my just-turned ten-year-old genius child, in terms anyone could understand. I DID NOT coach her in any way. No inflection in the voice, no winks, nothin’. These are her answers.

Q: Do you know what the economy is?
A: It’s about how much money people spend and invest, and about how many people are out of work.

Q: Which is called …
A: Unemployment.

Q: We’re having a presidential election tomorrow.
A: I know, Mom. [Well, pardon me!]

Q: Right now, the economy isn’t doing well. The government needs more money. Capital gains are when people invest and make a profit. Do you understand? (Yes.) People pay taxes on that profit. History shows that when the capital gains tax is lower, the government gets more money. Would you vote for the candidate who wants to raise the capital gains tax, or the candidate who doesn’t?
A: The candidate that doesn’t. The other one doesn’t make sense.

Q: If the economy is doing poorly, people usually have less money to spend, and prices on food and gas, etc., are higher. Knowing this, would it be smart to raise taxes on anyone?
A: No.

Q: One of the candidates wants to give people who don’t pay taxes, tax refunds or credits.
A: That doesn’t make sense either.

Q: Michaela, you don’t get an allowance, but you have money in your savings account, and a few hundred dollars in your room. How do you make your money?
A: I earn it working for you in your business. [No, she isn’t editing your manuscripts. She works for my handbag business.]

Q: What if the government said they thought someone else needed the money you earned more than you did, and took some of your money away, and gave it to another person who hadn’t earned it.
A: Mom, that would be stealing.

Q: So, you don’t think that’d be fair?
A: No. (the “Duh” look)

Q: If one candidate wanted to do this, and one didn’t, which candidate would you vote for?
A: The one that let me keep the money I earned.

Q: Are you a Christian?
A: Yes.

Q: Do you know what abortion is?
A: Yes.

Q: As a Christian, do you believe abortions are okay?
A: No.

Q: Do you know what a “partial birth” abortion is?
A: No.

Q: The definition is (loosely): The baby is partially delivered, and then the doctor depresses the baby’s head, or punctures the skull to make sure the baby isn’t born alive. Do you understand?
A: Yes.

Q: What word comes to mind for that process?
A: Putrid. [Out of the mouths of babes.]

Q: I was looking for a different kind of word.
A: (pause) Murder.

Q: Would you vote for the candidate who supports abortion, or the one who doesn’t?
A: The one that doesn’t.

Q: Some babies survive abortion. One candidate wants to let those babies live. The other voted 3 times for those babies not to live. Which candidate would you vote for?
A: The one that doesn’t want to kill the babies.

Q: We pay taxes so when we retire, we’ll have money. It’s called Social Security. Right now, the government controls Social Security. They’ve told us we might be paying that tax, but when we retire, the money might not be there for us. One candidate wants to let the government keep control of all the money from the taxes. One candidate wants to give each person a choice on how to invest a part of that money on their own. Which candidate would you vote for?
A: Okay, so we can either let the government keep all the money for us, or they keep some, and I have a choice on how I invest the rest of it? (Yes.) I’d vote for the person that gave me the choice.

Q: Right now, we have health insurance that helps us pay when we need to go to the doctor. Some people can’t afford it. One candidate wants the government to take over healthcare so everyone can go to the doctor, but the government is in charge. One candidate wants to give people a credit to help you pay for insurance, and you’d choose what kind of insurance you buy. Do you understand? (Yes.) Which candidate would you vote for?
A: The one that gave me the money to buy my own.

Q: When you go to school, you say the pledge of allegiance to the flag, don’t you?
A: Yes.

Q: Why?
A: To show respect for the flag, and the country.

Q: One candidate wants to stop people from burning the flag, spitting on the flag, etc. One candidate voted against protecting the flag. Which candidate would you vote for?
A: The one that wants to protect the flag.

Q: Most people in America know how to speak English. Some don’t. One candidate wants to make English the official language of our country. Do you understand? (Yes.) One voted against having English be the official language of the United States. Which candidate would you vote for?
A: The one that wants English to be our language.

Kelly: Well, that’s it. Thanks for doing the interview.
Michaela: So, Mom, which candidate did I vote for?
Kelly: John McCain
Michaela: (Smile)(She knows that’s who we’re voting for.)

The choice is obvious, even to a ten-year-old (or a caveman–what’s wrong with everyone else?)….

QUOTES: I want you to hear from the candidate. Here are some quotes from Mr. Obama:


OBAMA on the Coal Industry he just said he’d bankrupt:

“So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can; it’s just that it will bankrupt them because they’re going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that’s being emitted.”

Coal officials call Obama comments ‘unbelievable’ and a ‘disaster’- (An audio excerpt from the interview can be found at YouTube.) The senior vice president of the West Virginia Coal Association called Obama’s comments “unbelievable. His comments really reflect a very uninformed voice and perspective to coal specifically and energy generally.”. Mike Carey, president of the Ohio Coal Association (OCA), today issued the following statement in response to just-released remarks from Senator Barack Obama about the nation’s coal industry.

“Regardless of the timing or method of the release of these remarks, the message from the Democratic candidate for President could not be clearer: the Obama-Biden ticket spells disaster for America’s coal industry and the tens of thousands of Americans who work in it.

“These undisputed, audio-taped remarks, which include comments from Senator Obama like ‘I haven’t been some coal booster’ and ‘if they want to build [coal plants], they can, but it will bankrupt them’ are extraordinarily misguided.
“It’s evident that this campaign has been pandering in states like Ohio, Virginia, West Virginia, Indiana and Pennsylvania to attempt to generate votes from coal supporters, while keeping his true agenda hidden from the state’s voters.
“Senator Obama has revealed himself to be nothing more than a short- sighted, inexperienced politician willing to say anything to get a vote. But today, the nation’s coal industry and those who support it have a better understanding of his true mission, to ‘bankrupt’ our industry, put tens of thousands out of work and cause unprecedented increases in electricity prices.

OBAMA on Abortion:
“I’ve got two daughters. 9 years old and 6 years old. I am going to teach them first of all about values and morals. But if they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby.” [Teach them values and morals? Babies aren’t punishment. They’re human lives and a gift from God. Ask a childless couple desperate for a baby; they’ll take the “punishment.”]
 

OBAMA the Marxist/Socialist:
“This is the moment when we must build on the wealth that open markets have created, and share its benefits more equitably. Trade has been a cornerstone of our growth and global development. But we will not be able to sustain this growth if it favors the few, and not the many.”

“The reason that we want to do this, change our tax code [to “spread the wealth around], is not because I have anything against the rich. I love rich people! I want all of you to be rich. Go for it. That’s the America dream, that’s the American way, that’s terrific… [I want people to be rich too. But because they earned the money, not because they took the money from someone who earned it.]

“Focusing your life solely on making a buck shows a certain poverty of ambition. It asks too little of yourself. Because it’s only when you hitch your wagon to something larger than yourself that you realize your true potential.”

“John McCain and Sarah Palin they call this socialistic. You know I don’t know when, when they decided they wanted to make a virtue out of selfishness.” “We can’t drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times… and then just expect that other countries are going to say OK. That’s not leadership. That’s not going to happen.”

“We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded” as the military.” [Say WHAT? I decided to investigate further.]

Obama’s ‘Civilian Security Force’ Prompts Questions
Thursday, August 07, 2008
By Fred Lucas, Staff Writer

(CNSNews.com) –Regarding Mr. Obama’s national service plans and views on the “burden of global citizenship”…
 
“We’re going to grow our Foreign Service, open consulates that have been shuttered and double the size of the Peace Corps by 2011 to renew our diplomacy.
 
We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.
 
I believe we can reconfigure our civilian national-security force. We still have a national security apparatus on the civilian side, in the way the State Department is structured and USAID, that harkens back to the Cold War.”
 
A similar theme was repeated when Obama gave a speech entitled “A World that Stands as One” in front of 200,000 Germans in Berlin.
 
Obama called himself a “citizen of the world,” and said, “The burdens of global citizenship continue to bind us together. A change of leadership in Washington will not lift this burden.
 
In this new century, Americans and Europeans alike will be required to do more – not less. Partnership and cooperation among nations is not a choice; it is the one way, the only way, to protect our common security and advance our common humanity.”
(The Obama campaign did not respond to phone and e-mail messages to address the meaning behind his statements.)

OBAMA the Patriot and “Globalist”:

“People of Berlin - people of the world - this is our moment. This is our time.” [Ah, I thought you were runnin’ for President of the United States?]

“Instead of having a set of policies that are equipping people for the globalization of the economy, we have policies that are accelerating the most destructive trends of the global economy.”

“Where the stakes are the highest, in the war on terror, we cannot possibly succeed without extraordinary international cooperation. Effective international police actions require the highest degree of intelligence sharing, planning and collaborative enforcement.”

“I don’t oppose all wars. What I am opposed to is a dumb war. What I am opposed to is a rash war.” [My daughter fought in that war. She didn’t think it was dumb to free the people from Saddam Hussein, and neither did the hundreds of Iraqis who thanked her.]

“I know my country has not perfected itself. At times, we’ve struggled to keep the promise of liberty and equality for all of our people. We’ve made our share of mistakes, and there are times when our actions around the world have not lived up to our best intentions.”

“It’s not surprising, then, [us conservatives] they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.” [Guns and religion are our constitutional rights. And I intend to cling to mine.]

“We need to internalize this idea of excellence. Not many folks spend a lot of time trying to be excellent.” [Speak for yourself.]

OBAMA on Religion:

“You know, my faith is one that admits some doubt.” [Then it ain’t faith, Mr. Obama.]

OBAMA’s Pastor of 20 years:
“God bless America? God bless America. No! God Damn America! God damn America!”

Quote from a “follower”…

“I never thought this day would happen. I won’t have to work on puttin’ gas in my car. I won’t have to work at payin’ my mortgage. You know. If I help him [Obama], he’s gonna help me.” Peggy Joseph [Hey, Peggy. God helps those who help themselves.]

Obama and Friends:
(The LA Times is holding a video that shows Barack Obama celebrating with a group of Palestinians who are openly hostile towards Israel. Barack Obama even gives a toast to a former PLO operative at this celebration. If the American public saw this radical side of Barack Obama it is unlikely he would ever be elected president.
But, the media refuses to release this video.)

Terrorist Bill Ayers— Barack Obama— Jew-hater Rashid Khalidi
Bill Ayers and his wife Bernadine Dohrn were at the Jew-bash.

How radical is Barack Obama’s close friend, Rashid Khalidi?

Back on June 8, 1982, Thomas Friedman at the New York Times reported on Rashid Khalidi’s connections to the PLO terrorist organization.
The American Spectator reported, via LGF:

The evidence for the connections between Khalidi and the PLO are much more explicit than that. Thomas Friedman, in a June 8, 1982 New York Times piece about the Israeli invasion of Lebanon, referred to Khalidi as “a director of the Palestinian press agency, Wafa.” To be clear, Wafa is controlled by the PLO –and you don’t have to take my word for it. Even Khalidi himself, on page 7 of his 1986 book Under Siege: P.L.O. Decisionmaking During the 1982 War, describes it as “the P.L.O.’s news agency.”

That’s not the most telling part of Under Siege. In the book’s preface, Khalidi reserves his first paragraph of thanks for the research assistance provided by the PLO in general, and Arafat specifically. “Permission to utilize the P.L.O. Archives for the first time was generously given by the Chairman of the P.L.O. Executive Committee, Yasser ‘Arafat,” Khalidi wrote. “To him, and to the dedicated individuals working in the Office of the Chairman, the P.L.O. Archives, and the Palestine News Agency (WAFA), who extended every possible assistance to me on three trips to Tunis, I owe deep thanks.”

[But, of course, these reports were published before Obama was linked to this former PLO operative.]

Obama-Farrakhan Ties Are Close, Ex-Farrakhan Aide Says

By: Kenneth R. Timmerman
 
A former top deputy to Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan tells Newsmax that Barack Obama’s ties to the black nationalist movement in Chicago run deep, and that for many years the two men have had “an open line between them” to discuss policy and strategy, either directly or through intermediaries.

“Remember that for years, if you were a politician in Chicago, you had to have some type of relationship with Louis Farrakhan. You had to. If you didn’t, you would be ostracized out of black Chicago,” said Dr. Vibert White Jr., who spent most of his adult life as a member and ultimately top officer of the Nation of Islam.

White broke with the group in 1995 and is now a professor of African-American history at the University of Central Florida in Orlando.

White said Obama was “part of the Chicago scene” where Farrakhan, Jesse Jackson, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr. and radicals would go to each other’s events and support each other’s causes.

“Even though Chicago is the third-largest city in the country, within the black community, the political and militant nationalist community is very small. So it wouldn’t be uncommon for [Obama and Farrakhan] to show up at events together, or at least be there and communicate with each other,” White told Newsmax.

The Anti-Defamation League has denounced Farrakhan and his Nation of Islam as a “hate group.”

Farrakhan has called Jews “bloodsuckers,” “satanic” and accused them of running the slave trade. He has labeled gays as “degenerates.” In a 2006 speech, the ADL again condemned Farrakhan when he said: “These false Jews promote the filth of Hollywood that is seeding the American people and the people of the world and bringing you down in moral strength. … It’s the wicked Jews the false Jews that are promoting lesbianism, homosexuality. It’s wicked Jews, false Jews that make it a crime for you to preach the word of God, then they call you homophobic!”

Obama was careful to “denounce” Farrakhan’s comments – but not the man — during the Democratic primary season earlier this year, but only after Hillary Clinton called him out for benefiting from Farrakhan’s support.

Farrakhan endorsed Obama in a videotaped speech to his followers at Mosque Miryam in Chicago in February. “You are the instruments that God is gonna use to bring about universal change, and that is why Barack has captured the youth,” Farrakhan said.

He told the crowd that Obama was the new “messiah.” See Video: Farrakhan Endorses Obama, Calls Him Messiah.
Once the news media and the Clinton campaign got hold of those comments from Farrakhan, demands mounted from all sides that Obama “renounce” Farrakhan.

But as he has done repeatedly throughout this campaign, Obama was careful to parse his words.

“You know, I have been very clear in my denunciation of Minister Farrakhan’s anti-Semitic comments,” he said during one appearance on “Meet the Press.” “I think that they are unacceptable and reprehensible.”

Obama hastened to point out that Farrakhan had been praising him as “an African-American who seems to be bringing the country together. I obviously can’t censor him, but it is not support that I sought. And we’re not doing anything, I assure you, formally or informally with Minister Farrakhan.”

But Obama, once again, was less than candid.

In 1995, according to a profile of Obama that appeared in the Chicago Reader newspaper, Obama “took time off from attending campaign coffees to attend October’s Million Man March in Washington, D.C.”
At the time, Obama was running for the Illinois Senate from Chicago’s South Side, a seat he won after getting surrogates to challenge the signatures on nominating petitions for his chief rival, the incumbent Alice Palmer.

The march, which fell far short of attracting the million men it advertised, was organized by Farrakhan and by Obama’s then-pastor, the anti-white black nationalist Wright.

Obama spoke at length with the Chicago Reader upon his return from the Million Man March. “What I saw was a powerful demonstration of an impulse and need for African-American men to come together to recognize each other and affirm our rightful place in the society,” he said.

“These are mean, cruel times, exemplified by a ‘lock ’em up, take no prisoners’ mentality that dominates the Republican-led Congress,” Obama said.

“Historically, African-Americans have turned inward and towards black nationalism whenever they have a sense, as we do now, that the mainstream has rebuffed us, and that white Americans couldn’t care less about the profound problems African-Americans are facing.”

“Black nationalism” is a current of thought and political action in the African-American community that has been championed by the likes of Farrakhan, Wright, Malcolm X, the Black Panthers and Khalid al-Mansour. Obama discussed his attraction to black nationalism at length in his 1995 memoir “Dreams of My Father.”

Obama further parsed his words in a Feb. 25, 2008, presentation to a Jewish community meeting in Cleveland, Ohio, where he insisted that Wright “does not have a close relationship with Louis Farrakhan.”

And yet, just months earlier, Wright’s Trumpet magazine gave Farrakhan its Lifetime Achievement Dr. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. Trumpeter Award, saying that Farrakhan “truly epitomized greatness.”

That award was the fruit of a long and deep relationship between the two men, White told Newsmax. In 1984, Wright accompanied Farrakhan on his much-criticized trip to meet Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi, at a time when Gadhafi was considered an enemy of the United States.

Wright also accompanied Farrakhan and Jackson to Syria in 1986, where they successfully negotiated with Syrian strongman for the release of downed American pilot Robert O. Goodman.

Obama’s Speaking Style

In addition to the ideological affinity Obama expressed for the black nationalist movement, White believes that Obama owes much of his success as a public orator to speaking techniques that Farrakhan developed over the years, and exploited for years to great success.

“If you listen to the rhetoric and you take away Obama’s political jargon, you hear a religious tenor to it that is very much Nation of Islam-like. I don’t know if anyone has ever touched on it, but Obama’s speaking style is very Malcolm-like, very Farrakhan-like,” White said.

Any American who has listened to early radio or television interviews of Obama can hear how dramatically Obama’s speaking style has changed since he became a United States senator.

In clips dating from 2001 and even early 2004, Obama speaks haltingly and in long, rambling sentences packed with legalese and dense pseudo-academic rhetoric. But not today.

“As a former minister of the Nation of Islam, I know how they speak,” White told Newsmax. “I don’t know who was training Obama. But that style is not a ministerial style like in the Christian church. It’s a Nation of Islam style.”

White began in the late 1970s as a foot soldier in the Fruit of Islam, the military branch of Farrakhan’s Black Muslim group, then rose to become a minister of the Nation of Islam and a top deputy to Farrakhan himself.

Known initially as Brother Vibert L.X., and later as Minister V.L. Muhammad, he parted ways with Farrakhan not long after the Million Man March, after nearly 25 years within the organization.
White’s 2002 book “Inside the Nation of Islam” prompted death threats by Farrakhan loyalists, so he left Illinois and moved to Florida to teach at the University of Central Florida.

He told Newsmax that Obama’s remarkable speaking style, even his manner of standing at a podium to appear larger than life, is directly copied from Farrakhan.

“If the Nation of Islam can’t do anything else, it can train people how to speak. And nobody can outspeak a Muslim minister,” he said.

Earlier this year, a pro-Clinton blog run by former CIA officer Larry Johnson unearthed a 2004 photograph showing Michelle Obama and Farrakahn’s wife, Mother Khadijah Farrakhan, at an event hosted by Jackson’s Citizenship Education Foundation.

Newsmax queried Obama’s U.S. Senate office, his Chicago office and his campaign press office about his ties to Farrakhan, but did not receive a reply.

Ever since he appeared before the annual policy conference of the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee in June, Obama has attempted to convince the Jewish community that he is pro-Israel.

But his longstanding ties to Farrakhan, Wright and Palestinian activist Rashid Khalidi, among others, have disturbed many Jewish community leaders.

Sen. John McCain publicly chastised The Los Angeles Times on Thursday for not releasing a videotape the newspaper said it possessed of a 2003 dinner for Khalidi, where Obama reportedly accused Israel of carrying out a “genocide” against the Palestinians.

The choice is yours, guys. As for me, my liberty ain’t for sale. I support Senator McCain.

K.